Next: Eval During Expansion, Previous: Argument Evaluation, Up: Problems with Macros [Contents][Index]
In the previous section, the definition of for
was fixed as follows to make the expansion evaluate the macro
arguments the proper number of times:
(defmacro for (var from init to final do &rest body) "Execute a simple for loop: (for i from 1 to 10 do (print i))."
`(let ((,var ,init)
(max ,final))
(while (<= ,var max)
,@body
(inc ,var))))
The new definition of for has a new problem: it
introduces a local variable named max which the user
does not expect. This causes trouble in examples such as the
following:
(let ((max 0))
(for x from 0 to 10 do
(let ((this (frob x)))
(if (< max this)
(setq max this)))))
The references to max inside the body of the
for, which are supposed to refer to the user’s
binding of max, really access the binding made by
for.
The way to correct this is to use an uninterned symbol instead
of max (see Creating Symbols).
The uninterned symbol can be bound and referred to just like any
other symbol, but since it is created by for, we
know that it cannot already appear in the user’s program.
Since it is not interned, there is no way the user can put it
into the program later. It will never appear anywhere except
where put by for. Here is a definition of
for that works this way:
(defmacro for (var from init to final do &rest body)
"Execute a simple for loop: (for i from 1 to 10 do (print i))."
(let ((tempvar (make-symbol "max")))
`(let ((,var ,init)
(,tempvar ,final))
(while (<= ,var ,tempvar)
,@body
(inc ,var)))))
This creates an uninterned symbol named max and
puts it in the expansion instead of the usual interned symbol
max that appears in expressions ordinarily.
Next: Eval During Expansion, Previous: Argument Evaluation, Up: Problems with Macros [Contents][Index]